Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G. & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographicalevents. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 311–316.

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. & Lindsay, B. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114,3-29.

Kalbfleisch, P. (1992). Beceit, distrust and the social milieu: application of deception research in a troubled world.Journal of Applied Communication Research, 20,308334.

Kalbfleisch, P.J. (1994). The language of detecting deceit. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 469–496.

Kalma, A., Witte, M. & Zaalberg, R. (1996). Authenticity: operationalization, manipulation, and behavioural components: an explanation. Medium Psychologic, 5,49–65.

Kashy, B. A. & BePaulo, В. M. (1996). Who lies? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,!0,1031–1051.

Kassin, S. M. (1991). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52,221–233.

Kircher, J. C. & Raskin, В. С. (1988). Human versus computerized evaluations of polygraph data in a laboratory setting. Journal of Applied Psychology, 13, 291–302.

Kircher, J. C., Horowitz, S. W. & Raskin, В. C. (1988). Meta-analysis of mock crime studies of the control question polygraph technique. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 19–90.

Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100,18-100.

Kleinmuntz, B. & Szucko, J. J. (1982). On the fallibility of lie detection. Law and Society Review, 11, 85104.

Kleinmuntz, B. & Szucko, J. J. (1984). Lie detection in ancient and modern times: a call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39, 166–116.

Kline, P. (1993). The handbook of psychological testing. New York: Routledge.

Knapp, M. L., Hart, R. P. & Bennis, H. S. (1914). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1,15–29.

Kdinken, G. (1985). Speech and deception of eyewitnesses: an information processing approach. In F. L. Benmark (Ed.), The psychology of women. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 111–139.

Kdinken, G. (1981). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements. Boes it work? Social Behaviour, 2, 1-11.

Kdinken, G. (1989). Behavioral correlates of statement credibility: theories, paradigms and results. In H. Wegener, F. Losel & J. Haisch (Eds), Criminal behavior and the justice system: psychological perspectives. New York-Springer-Verlag, 211–289.

Kdinken, G. (1990). Glaubwiirdigkeit: Untersuchungen zu einem psycholo-gischen konstrukt. Munich: Psychologie Verlags Union.

Kdinken, G. (1996). Social psychology and the law. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds), Applied Social Psychology. London: Sage Publications, 251–282.

Kdinken, G. & Wegener, H. (1982). Zur Glaubwiirdigkeit von Zeugenaussagen: Experimentelle Uberprufungausgewahlter Glaubwiirdigkeitskriterien (Credibility of witness statements: experimental examination of selected reality criteria). Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie 29, 92-111.

Kdinken, G., Milne, R., Memon, A. & Bull, R. (in press). The cognitive interview: a metaanalysis. Psychology, Crime, and Law.

Kdinken, G., Schimossek, E., Aschermann, E. & Hofer, E. (1995). The cognitive interview and the assessment of the credibility of adults' statements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 611–684.

Koppelaar, L., Winkel, F.W. & Steen, J. C. van der (1986). Psychologische kant-tekeningen bij art 21 Sv.: een experiment rond etnische origine, ritmisch gedrag en verdacht zijn. Delikt en Delinkwent, 16, 25–38.