Браун Рэймонд
Шрифт:
Библиография
Введение и евангельский жанр
Aune, D. E.,"The Problem of the Genre of the Gospels,"GP 2 (1981), 9–60.
Burridge, R. ., What Are the Gospels? A Companson with Graeco-Roman Biography (SNTSMS 70; Cambridge Univ., 1992).
Goosen, G., and M. Tomlinson, Studying the Gospels: An Introduction (Ridgefield, CT: Morehouse, 1994). Интересно и популярно написано.
O' Grady, J. F., The Four Gospels and the Jesus Tradition (New York: Paulist, 1989).
Robbins, V. K.,"Mark as Genre,"SBLSP 1980, 371–399.
Shuler, PL., A Genre for the Gospels (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1982).
Stanton, G. N.,"Matthew: Biblos, Euaggelion, or Bios"FGN 2.1187–1201.
Swartley, W. M., Israel's Scripture Traditions and the Synoptic Gospels. Story Shaping Story (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1994).
Talbert, C. H., What Is a Gospel? The Genre of the Canonical Gospels (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1971).
Votaw, C. W., The Gospels and Contemporary Biographies in the Greco-Roman World (Facet Biblical Series 27; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1970).
Синоптическая проблема
Barr, ., Diagram of Synoptic Relationships (new ed.; Edinburgh: Clark, 1995).
Bellinzoni, A. J., et al., eds., The Two-Source Hypothesis (Macon GA: Mercer, 1985). Представляет различные точки зрения.
Butler, B. C., The Oriiginality of St. Matthew (Cambridge Univ., 1951). Августинианская гипотеза.
Deardorff, J. W., The Problems of New Testament Gospel Oriigins (San Francisco, CA: Mellen, 1992). Августинианская гипотеза.
Dungan, D. L., ed., The Interrelations of the Gospels (BETL 95; Leuven: Peeters, 1990).
Farmer, W. R., The Synoptic Problem (2d ed.; Dillsboro: Western North Carolina, 1976). Защита гипотезы Грисбаха.
—,"Modern Developments of Griesbachs Hypothesis,"NTS 23 (1976–1977), 275–295.
—, The Gospel of Jesus: The Pastoral Relevance of the Synoptic Problem (Louisville: W/K, 1994).
Johnson, S. E., The Griesbach Hypothesis and Redaction Criticism (SBLMS 41; Atlanta: Scholars, 1991). Против гипотезы Грисбаха
Longstaff, T. R. W., and P. A. Thomas, eds., The Synoptic Problem: A Bibliography 1916–1988 (Macon, GA: Mercer, 1988).
Neirynck, F., ed., The Minor Agreements of Matthew and Luke against Mark (Gembloux: Duculot, 1974).
Neville, D. J., Arguments from Order in Synoptic Source Criticism (Macon, GA: Mercer, 1994).
New, D. S., Old Testament Quotations in the Synoptic Gospels and the Two-Document Hypothesis (Atlanta: Scholars, 1993). Против гипотезы Грисбаха.
Orchard, В., Matthew, Luke, and Mark (Collegeville: Liturgical, 1976). Защита гипотезы Грисбаха.
Orchard, В., and H. Riley, The Order of the Synoptics. Why Three Synoptic Gospels? (Macon, GA: Mercer, 1987). Защита гипотезы Грисбаха.
Riley, H., The Making of Mark (Macon, GA: Mercer, 1989). Защита гипотезы Грисбаха.
Stanton, G.., The Gospels and Jesus (New York: Oxford, 1989).
Gospel Truth? (Valley Forge, PA: Trinity, 1995).
Stein, R. H., The Synoptic Problem (Grand Rapids: Baker, 1987).
Stoldt, H. — H., History and Criticism of the Markan Hypothesis (Macon, GA: Mercer, 1980). Против приоритета Мк.
Strecker, G., ed., Minor Agreements (G"ottingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1993).
Styler, G. M.,"The Priority of Mark,"in Moule, Birth 285–316. Изложение подкреплено хорошими примерами.
Taylor, V., The Formation of the Gospel Tradition (London: Macmillan, 1953). По–прежнему важное исследование.