•Baumeister Roy F., Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer, and Kathleen D. Vohs, «Bad Is Stronger Than Good,» Review of General Psychology 5 (2001): 323.

•Blackmore, Susen. The Meme Machine Oxford University Press, 1999.

•Brodie, Richard. Virus of the Mind.. The New Science of the Meme. Seattle, WA, Integral Press, 1996.

•Brugger, Peter. From haunted brain to haunted science: a cognitive neuroscience view of paranormal and pseudoscientific thought. In J. Houran & R. Lange (Eds.): Hauntings and Poltergeists: Multidisciplinary Perspectives. Jefferson (NC): McFarland. (pp. 195–213), 2001.

•Burson, K. A., Larrick, R. P., & Klayman J. (2006, January). Skilled or unskilled, but still unaware of it: how perceptions of difficulty drive miscalibration in relative comparisons. Journal of Personality and Social Psycholog, 90(1), 60–77.

•Buss, D. M. The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating. New York: BasicBooks. 1994.

•Claxton, Guy. Noises from the Darkroom. London, Aquarian, 1994.

•Cohen J. A., Fox M. W. Vocalizations in wild canids and possible effects of domestication // Behav. Processes. 1976. V. 1. P. 77–92.

•Cosmides and Tooby 1994. Beyond intuition and instinct blindness: Toward an evolutionarily rigorous cognitive science. Cognition 50:41–77.

•Crick, Francis. The Astonishing Hypothesis: The Scientific Search for the Soul. New, 1994 York, Charles Scribner’s Sons.

•Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience New York: Harper, 1990.

•Darley, J. M., & Batson, C. D. (1973). From Jerusalem to Jericho: A study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 27(1), 100–108.

•Dawkins, Richard. The selfish gene. 1976. New ed., 1989. New York: Oxford University Press.

•Dawkins, Richard. The extended phenotype. New York: Oxford University Press.1982.

•Dawkins, Richard. The blind watchmaker. New York: Norton.1986.

•Dawkins, Richard. Climbing mount improbable. New York: Norton 1996.

•Dawkins, Richard. The god delusion, London: Bantam Press 2006.

•Dean, Geoffrey. and Kelly, Ivan. «Is Astrology Relevant to Consciousness and Psi?» Journal of Consciousness Studies. Volume 10, No. 6–7, June-July 2003.

•Dennett, Daniel C. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1984.

•Dennett, Daniel C. Consciousness explained Back Bay Books/Little, Brown and Company New York, 1991.

•Dennett, Daniel C. Darwin's dangerous idea Penguin Books London, 1995.

•Dennett, Daniel C. Breaking the spell Penguin Books London, 2006.

•Dennett, Daniel C. Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking W. W. Norton & Company NY, 2013.

•Denes-Raj, V., & Epstein, S. (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66(5), 819–829.

•Evans, J. St. B. T., 2002. Matching bias and set sizes: A discussion of Yama (2001). Thinking and Reasoning 8:153–63.

•Frankfurt, Harry. 1971. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. Journal of Philosophy 68:5–20.

•Gardner, Martin. The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener New York: Quill, 1983.

•Gidal, Tim N. Die Juden in Deutschland von der Romerzeit bis zur Weimarer Republik, Bertelsmann, GQtersloh, 1988.

•Groopman, Jerome. How Doctors Think Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2007.

•Heuristics and biases: the psychology of intuitive judgment. Edited by Thomas Gilobich, Griffin, Dale and Kahneman, Daniel. Cambridge University Press, 2002.

•Heyes, C. M. and Galef, B. G. (ed.) (1996). Social Learning in Animals: The Roots of Culture. San Diego, CA, Academic Press.

•Hinde, R. A., Barden, L. A. The evolution of the Teddy Bear. Animal Behaviour 33, 1985, pp.1371–1373.

•Hines, Terence. Pseudoscience and the Paranormal Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books, 2003.

•Hofstadter, Douglas. 1982, Metamagical Themas: Can Creativity Be Mechanized? Scientific American, September, pp. 18–34.

•Johnson, E. J., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., and Kunreuther, H. Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. In Choices, values, and frames, ed. D. Kahneman and A. Tversky, 224–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000.

•Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Edited by Daniel Kahneman, Paul Slovic, Amos Tversky. Cambridge University Press, 2001.