' Крузенштерн dissembled. It(he) perfectly knew about the decision Александра I. In Kronstadt it(him) has informed Резанов about highest will. The government of the company in the instruction wrote to it(him), Крузенштерну, about Резанове, that ' authorizing his(its) complete master's person not only in time вояжа, but also in America ', obliged Крузенштерна: ' you will not leave to be guided by his(its) advice(councils) in all ' ' [Фирсов And. И.].

So, we can ascertain, that on expedition(dispatch) three centres of authority (троецентрие) were objectively created.

Itself многоцентрие, but in a format not троецентрия, and двоецентрия, at all is not than that unique. In depth of a history we notice, for example, two Roman consuls. In epoch Александра I, ambassador of a beginning of Domestic war of 1812, we see concerning equal in rights Багратиона and Барклая де Толли. Probably, it is possible to recollect and commissioners, which in some periods could cancel the orders of the commanders.

С. Item. Мельгунов has named the book ' Александр I. A sphynx on престоле '.

In троецентрии we can see a mysterious smile of a Sphynx.

Whether was rational мотивировка троецентрия?

Probably, it is possible to speak about the following rational substantiations трехцентричного of management:

(1) Priorities of embassy (state task).

The note: after ' wars of nerves ' and self-isolation Н. Item. Резанова at itself in a cabin the management of expedition(dispatch) becomes двуцентричным де факто.

Двуцентричным де юре the management of expedition(dispatch) becomes from the moment of end of attempts of accommodation of embassy in Japan, оставления Резановым "of 'Hope" (1805) and direction Н. Item. Резанова in Russia through Siberia (in ways Н. Item. Резанов has died of illness in 1807).

Полицентричность (двуцентричность) "'обнуляется" after an output(exit) from Кантона and passage by the ships of cape of Kind Hope. The ships have lost each other from a kind, and further moved independently from each other on various trajectories.

(2) Полицентричность promoted взаимодополнению. In the certain periods of navigation (both captains are especial in the initial period) worked in common, that allowed the beginning captains (rather beginning) to lean(base) on cooperation and mutual aid, accumulating experience. In foreign ports two ships looked more solidly, than one.

(3) Полицентричность provided the mutual control.

(4) Полицентричность formed an atmosphere соревновательности. Though aspiration Ю. Ф. Лисянского to independent navigation soon after passage of cape of Kind Hope also can cause some questions, it, this aspiration, was programmed itself полицентричностью of management of expedition(dispatch).

' Intense conditions created from behind the claims Резанова, ... ' exhausts forces human '. In Петропавловске on Kamchatka Крузенштерн was going to hand over командование by courts to other officers. It was the ultimatum.

In the letter to the sea minister of item. In. Чичагову Лисянский wrote: ' Предпринявши вояж around of light under командою of my friend, ... I токмо expected minute of this important subject, but in islands Маркизских all has turned to dream. There. Резанов has announced to us publicly, that it(he) is our chief. Рисковавши every minute by life for glory ours государя and Fatherland, whether it was possible to us to expect командующего of the so important expedition(dispatch), which before сим did not see almost sea? ' The Commander "of 'Neva" has addressed to the Main government Российско of the American company and to the minister of commerce Румянцеву with the request to dismiss it(him) from командования by a vessel ' or to exclude from command from which, except for the unfortunate end of all our works nothing can be expected '. However applications Крузенштерна and Лисянского about a resignation were not taken into account. Румянцев, at which the documents враждующих of the parties converged, not only has not made neither envoy, nor officers of any reproach, but even has taken care of, that they have received the awards. In comparison with success of navigation of the ships from Kronstadt to Kamchatka and северо this quarrel was represented to western coast of America not so already by significant event. Румянцев did not consider(count) Крузенштерна as the originator of misunderstanding. Moreover, Румянцев has made Крузенштерна by the scientific adviser on sea and polar researches and has kept the friendly attitudes(relations) with it(him) about last days of the life ' [Пасецкий In. М.].

It is complex(difficult) to tell, in what has constrained Н. Item Резанов And. Ф. Крузенштерна (but nevertheless instructions(indication) of the man not having sea experience and sea intuition, could be constraining).

Naturally, the instructions(indication) of the man not having sea experience which is not understanding of importance of special knowledge and seaworthy intuition, could be dangerous. In this sense And. Ф. Крузенштерн struggled for freedom of actions of the commander, for safe and successful navigation.

But to it общепонятным the reasons can add still such reflections.

That would be, if the expedition(dispatch) has come back in structure of two courts and with Н. Item. Резановым onboard one of them?

What name she(it) would receive? Round-the-world expedition(dispatch) Резанова? Резанова Крузенштерна? Резанова Крузенштерна Лисянского?

Гиперболизируя and dreaming, it is possible to tell, that on кону there was a place in a history.

So, the game went for important things: